Ann Shteir (Hg.) 2022. Flora’s Fieldworkers. Women and Botany in Nineteenth-Century Canada. Tobias Delfs 2024. Koloniale Naturforschung und Südasien. Die Beteiligung deutscher Botaniker an der imperialen Wissensproduktion in der ersten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Botanik galt im .Jahrhundert als die imperiale Wissenschaft schlecht hin -ein Umstand, dem die historische Forschung in den letzten drei Jahrzehnten mit einer ganzen Reihe von Untersuchungen zur Rolle botani scher Gärten und Versuchsstationen, zur Bedeutung botanischer Erkennt nisgewinne für die Plantagenwirtschaft und die damit verbundenen ökolo gischen Folgen sowie zum Beitrag des botanischen Feldes generell bei der Durchsetzung hegemonialer Wissensordnungen intensiv Rechnung getra gen hat.In diesen Forschungszusammenhang ordnen sich auch die beiden
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.131 | 0.053 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".