MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414856475 · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2025.3611832

FedMPS: Federated Learning in a Synergy of Multi-Level Prototype-Based Contrastive Learning and Soft Label Generation

2025· article· en· W4414856475 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsConsistency (knowledge bases)Feature (linguistics)Raw dataCode (set theory)Feature extractionConvergence (economics)Key (lock)Federated learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Federated learning (FL) facilitates collaborative training among multiple clients while preserving data privacy by eliminating raw data transmission. However, the inherent data heterogeneity among participants induces bias during collaborative learning, significantly degrading the performance of local models. Existing FL solutions face critical challenges in achieving efficient knowledge transmission, particularly with respect to insufficient information extraction or excessive communication costs, which result in slow convergence and inferior performance. To address these limitations, we propose a novel FL framework in a synergy of multi-level prototype-based contrastive learning (CL) and soft label generation, named FedMPS. The proposed method first constructs multi-level prototypes from different layers of the model to capture semantic information in high-level features and detailed information in low-level features. These prototypes are then utilized through CL to enhance intra-class discriminability and intra-class consistency in the feature space. In addition, a prototype-guided soft label generation module is introduced to model latent interclass relationships in the output space. Instead of exchanging model parameters, FedMPS transmits only prototypes and soft labels, effectively reducing global knowledge shift and communication costs. Extensive experimental studies on six publicly available datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed method when compared to the current state-of-the-art FL approaches. The code is available at github.com/wenxinyang1026/FedMPS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.860

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it