Les archives comme outils de reconnaissance culturelle dans le cinéma autochtone au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se consacre à la manière dont les archives sont utilisées par des cinéastes autochtones pour assurer la continuité de la mémoire culturelle. Nous démontrons ainsi, dans un premier temps, comment la cinéaste abénaquise Kim O’Bomsawin puise dans les images d’archives provenant de diverses sources externes pour rendre hommage à la parole des Anciens, ainsi que pour souligner l’importance de la transmission intergénérationnelle et le maintien de la relation avec le territoire. Dans un second temps, à travers une analyse du moyen métrage documentaire The Oka Legacy (Sonia Bonspille-Boileau, 2015) nous examinons comment la réalisatrice Mohawk utilise des archives vidéo autochtones pour assurer une certaine continuité dans le temps en reliant images passées et témoignages présents. Dans un troisième temps, nous mettons en lumière, à travers une étude de cas, le rôle des collaborations interculturelles dans la sauvegarde, la remédiation et la circulation d’archives autochtones appartenant à un collectif de femmes inuit, Arnait Video Productions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".