La création sonore dans le cinéma québécois : trois territoires sonores pour une politique de l’écoute
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis 2008, le laboratoire La création sonore : cinéma, arts médiatiques, arts du son a multiplié les façons d’écouter le cinéma québécois. D’abord, l’organisation d’ateliers de maître avec les artisans de la bande sonore a permis de découvrir une posture plaçant l’écoute et le bricolage au centre du processus de création. Ensuite, l’analyse des discours et des pratiques, notamment celles de l’Atelier de conception et de réalisation sonores de l’ONF (1971-1980), a permis d’inscrire les pratiques québécoises de conception sonore dans une histoire culturelle de l’écoute filmique. Puis, l’écoute des films de Fernand Bélanger, Sylvain L’Espérance, Clément Perron, etc., a révélé une diversité de rapports entre le son et l’image, et des relations entre innovations techniques et imagination sociale. Enfin, des membres du laboratoire ont repris les méthodes des artisans québécois du son dans leurs projets de recherche-création, ouvrant ainsi l’espace de la recherche sur une tradition sonore encore méconnue, inouïe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".