STARS: Stability-Aware SFC Orchestration and Associations in LEO Satellite Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite networks present critical challenges for security function chain (SFC) orchestration and associations due to rapid topology changes, resource volatility, and heterogeneous service requirements that render conventional SFC optimization approaches ineffective. To tackle this issue, we introduce here STARS, an optimization framework that fundamentally transforms the sequential time-window optimization for SFC orchestration and satellite association through three techniques: (1) Stability-aware regularization that penalizes configuration changes across time windows, thus reducing handovers by 54% and security function migrations by 33%; (2) Temporal decoupling that leverages solutions from prior time windows as warm-start seeds and dynamic repairing using real-time visibility constraints; and (3) Hierarchical decoupling that separates satellite association and SFC placement into computationally efficient stages, thus reducing time complexity. Through rigorous formulation as a mixed-integer non-linear programming (MINLP) and simulation-based evaluation, STARS achieves a 57% reduction in optimization solution time, a 7% reduction in the load of deployed security function instances, and efficient CPU utilization (9.81% increase) compared to benchmark schemes. STARS delivers these substantial benefits without any degradation in end-to-end delay. Note that the reported performance values are based on our specific system parameter choices and simulation setup and may not be universally representative. The co-design of stability mechanisms and decoupling strategies establishes STARS as a new paradigm for resilient satellite network optimization, balancing optimality, continuity, and computational tractability under high LEO satellite dynamicity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".