MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Error-State Model Predictive Path Integral Control of Tendon-Driven Continuum Robots using Cosserat Rod Dynamics with Strain Parametrization

2025· article· en· W4414858420 on OpenAlexafffund
Elaheh Arefinia, Navid Feizi, Filipe Pedrosa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Model predictive controlTrajectoryWeightingNonlinear systemPosition (finance)Controller (irrigation)RobotParametrization (atmospheric modeling)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new error-state Model Predictive Path Integral (MPPI) framework for tendon-driven continuum robots (TDCRs). Tracking-error dynamics are derived employing a Lie group formulation, which preserves full pose geometry. This formulation yields more precise error metrics and enhanced position and orientation control. A nonlinear Cosseratrod model with strain parameterization is used to represent a closed form of TDCR dynamics. Using advanced implementation and valid assumptions, the model updates in approximately 0.3 ± 0.3 ms. The model is calibrated using weight release and actuation-based experiments on tendon-driven robotic ablation catheters. The states of the model are generalized coordinates that are estimated using a nested optimization. The proposed algorithm parallelizes the generation and evaluation of control trajectories. Also, the MPPI controller compensates for actuation uncertainties. Each control trajectory is sampled from the current best control trajectory, and the trajectory's cost function combines a baseline performance term with an adaptive uncertainty penalty. The latter describes measurement uncertainty. Then an exponential weighting scheme prioritizes lower-cost control trajectories. Also, the tendon displacement is used for the actuation and is acquired through an optimization that bypasses the need for force sensing. The framework can be employed for advanced medical TDCR applications such as cardiac ablation. The control algorithm is compared with a conventional Model Predictive Controller (MPC) via experiments. The results show that the proposed MPPI-based approach results in higher precision and greater computational efficiency than MPC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDynamics and Control of Mechanical SystemsFrench-language works237,207