MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414858684 · doi:10.1097/jte.0000000000000452

Leadership Education in Physical Therapy: A Roadmap to Prioritize Interventions

2025· article· en· W4414858684 on OpenAlex
F. Paquet, Richard Debigaré, Alexandre Lafleur

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Therapy Education · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Therapy Practice and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalHôpital Saint-François d'Assise
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological interventionOutcome (game theory)Leadership developmentIntervention (counseling)MEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Leadership training is crucial for meeting the evolving demands in health care, but remains inconsistently integrated into physical therapist education programs. This study aims to identify impactful educational interventions from health care programs that would be relevant for developing leadership competencies in entry-level physical therapy programs. REVIEW OF LITERATURE: Although leadership development is well-researched in medicine and nursing, evidence-based interventions specific to physical therapy education remain underexplored. This gap hampers innovation in teaching and research, potentially compromising the profession's capacity to sustain and expand its scope of practice. SUBJECTS: This consensus study involved 19 academic faculty members from 9 Canadian university physical therapy programs, all of which are aligned with global competency frameworks. METHODS: A literature review using Medline, CINAHL, and ERIC identified studies evaluating leadership education interventions in university health sciences programs. Interventions were categorized by Tremblay-Wragg's educational strategies and by impact levels based on Kirkpatrick's model. A Delphi method was employed to reach consensus on the relevance of implementing these interventions in physical therapy education to foster health promotion, advocacy, and scope of practice expansion. RESULTS: Thirty articles were selected, identifying 27 interventions, primarily in medicine (n = 10) and nursing (n = 10). The two-round Delphi study reached consensus on 24 interventions, with the strongest agreement to include internships in community settings (100% agreement), community service projects (95% agreement), and advocacy projects (95% agreement). The most endorsed educational strategies were project-based learning (24%), teamwork (21%), experiential learning (14%), all socio-constructivist approaches. The selected interventions predominantly (63%) demonstrated impacts on attitudes, knowledge, or skills (Kirkpatrick level 2). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study offers an evidence-based roadmap of impactful leadership interventions that can be adapted to the practical realities of physical therapy programs. Prioritizing these interventions may enhance students' leadership competencies and support future multisite trials and longitudinal outcome research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.214
GPT teacher head0.578
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it