Dual-stream multi-layer cross encoding network for texture analysis of architectural heritage elements
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Texture provides valuable insights into building materials, structure, style, and historical context. However, traditional deep learning features struggle to address architectural textures due to complex inter-class similarities and intra-class variations. To overcome these challenges, this paper proposes a Dual-stream Multi-layer Cross Encoding Network (DMCE-Net). DMCE-Net treats deep feature maps from different layers as experts, each focusing on specific texture attributes. It includes two complementary encoding streams: the intra-layer encoding stream efficiently captures diverse texture perspectives from individual layers through multi-attribute joint encoding, while the inter-layer encoding stream facilitates mutual interaction and knowledge integration across layers using a cross-layer binary encoding mechanism. By leveraging collaborative interactions between both streams, DMCE-Net effectively models and represents complex texture attributes of architectural heritage elements. Extensive experimental evaluations on architectural heritage datasets and three texture databases demonstrate that DMCE-Net achieves superior performance compared to existing deep learning methods and handcrafted features, providing reliable texture representations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it