Tree Health Assessment Using Mask R-CNN on UAV Multispectral Imagery over Apple Orchards
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate tree health monitoring in orchards is essential for optimal orchard production. This study investigates the efficacy of a deep learning-based object detection single-step method for detecting tree health on multispectral UAV imagery. A modified Mask R-CNN framework is employed with four different backbones—ResNet-50, ResNet-101, ResNeXt-101, and Swin Transformer—on three image combinations: (1) RGB images, (2) 5-band multispectral images comprising RGB, Red-Edge, and Near-Infrared (NIR) bands, and (3) three principal components (3PCs) computed from the reflectance of the five spectral bands and twelve associated vegetation index images. The Mask R-CNN, having a ResNeXt-101 backbone, and applied to the 5-band multispectral images, consistently outperforms other configurations, with an F1-score of 85.68% and a mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of 92.85%. To address the class imbalance, class weighting and focal loss were integrated into the model, yielding improvements in the detection of the minority class, i.e., the unhealthy trees. The tested method has the advantage of allowing the detection of unhealthy trees over UAV images using a single-step approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".