MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414866890 · doi:10.4271/2025-01-0393

Effect of Flow Speed and Turbulence on Methane Combustion in a Rapid Compression Machine

2025· article· en· W4414866890 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Haider, Long Jin, Xiao Yu, Graham T. Reader, Ming Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbulenceShadowgraphCombustionIgnition systemFlow (mathematics)Spark-ignition engineCombustion chamberNaturally aspirated engine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Recent experimental work from the authors’ laboratory demonstrated that applying a boosted current ignition strategy under intensified flow conditions can significantly reduce combustion duration in a rapid compression machine (RCM). However, that study relied on spark anemometry, which provided only localized flow speed estimates and lacked full spatial resolution of velocity and turbulence near the spark gap. Additionally, the influence of turbulence on combustion behavior and performance across varying flow speeds and excess air ratios using a conventional transistor-controlled ignition (TCI) system was not thoroughly analyzed. In this study, non-reactive CFD simulations were used to estimate local flow and turbulent velocities near the spark gap for piston speeds ranging from 1.2 to 9.7 m/s. Simulated local velocities ranged from 0.7 to 96 m/s and were used to interpret experimentally observed combustion behavior under three excess air ratios (λ = 1.0, 1.4, and 1.6). Combustion was analyzed using pressure-based normalized cumulative heat release (NCHR) durations and high-speed shadowgraph imaging. At stoichiometric conditions (λ = 1.0), combustion duration decreased by over 70% with increasing flow speed, with optimal behavior observed between 33 and 72 m/s. At 96 m/s, durations increased again due to early spark kernel displacement and greater convective losses. For λ = 1.4, the shortest durations occurred near 23 m/s, corresponding to an 87% reduction in flame initiation time. At higher flow speeds, ignition consistency declined, with complete misfires at 72 m/s. For ultra-lean mixtures (λ = 1.6), stable combustion was only observed at low flow speeds (≤ 9 m/s); beyond this, ignition failed entirely due to heat loss and limited mixture reactivity. Shadowgraph imaging confirmed that larger, faster-growing flame kernels formed at optimal flow speeds, correlating with shorter combustion durations and higher peak pressures. At excessive flow intensities, however, early flame kernel disruption and elevated convective losses led to slower combustion or complete misfire.</div></div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207