MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414867159 · doi:10.1002/ange.202517004

Mechanochemical <i>Cis/Trans</i> Isomerization of a Metal Centre Involving a Metal‐Organic Halogen‐Bonded (MOXB) Cocrystal

2025· article· en· W4414867159 on OpenAlexafffund
Katarina Lisac, Luzia S. Germann, Mihails Arhangelskis, Martin Etter, Robert E. Dinnebier, Tomislav Friščić, Dominik Cinčić

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCrystallography and molecular interactions
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersUniversity of BirminghamLeverhulme TrustHrvatska Zaklada za ZnanostMcGill University
KeywordsIsomerizationCocrystalMechanochemistryHalogen bondHalogenMetalDiffraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Halogen bonding enables the mechanochemical ball‐milling isomerization of an otherwise persistent cis ‐coordinated metal complex into the corresponding trans ‐isomer. The importance of halogen bonding for enabling the cis → trans isomerization of the metal centre is evidenced by real‐time in situ synchrotron powder X‐ray diffraction monitoring of the ball‐milling experiments that showed the transient appearance of a cis ‐geometry metal‐organic halogen‐bonded (MOXB) cocrystal, which is rapidly replaced by the corresponding trans ‐geometry one, with any excess, non‐halogen‐bonded cis ‐geometry complex being retained throughout the milling experiment. The importance of cocrystallization for cis → trans isomerization is supported by periodic density‐functional theory calculations which show that the process becomes notably more enthalpically favourable in the presence of the halogen bond donor. The presented work indicates that the formation of MOXB cocrystals can open the door to new, metal‐based responsive behaviours, different from those of parent solid‐state coordination complexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte ChemieSame topicCrystallography and molecular interactionsFrench-language works237,207