MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414869392 · doi:10.1002/asjc.3862

Exponential synchronization of delayed networked systems with delay‐dependent impulsive control

2025· article· en· W4414869392 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Journal of Control · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks Stability and Synchronization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImpulse (physics)Control theory (sociology)Synchronization (alternating current)NoveltyInterval (graph theory)Exponential functionImpulse control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This study deals with the synchronization problem in time‐delay networked systems with large delayed impulsive control. A novel inequality of the Razumikhin‐type is introduced, and it incorporates the concept of impulses with beyond‐interval delays by utilizing an innovative interval partition analysis approach. Based on the formulated inequality, a set of sufficient criteria for achieving global exponential synchronization (GES) in a class of networked leader–follower systems are obtained. Being different from the previous results in the literature, the novelty of the proposed approach exists in the fact that impulse delays are not constrained by the impulse interval, and the design process is much straightforward. Two numerical examples verify the effectiveness of the presented results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it