DRL-Based User Fairness in Beyond Diagonal Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Assisted Extremely Large Antenna Array Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the user fairness for multi-user downlink communications systems with beyond diagonal-reconfigurable intelligent surface (BDRIS) and extremely large antenna array (ELAA), which takes advantage of interconnected elements and spherical wavefront characteristics in the near field. We formulate a user fairness-oriented optimization problem and develop a deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-based algorithm to effectively maximize fairness among users. The proposed framework provides a fast converging solution and simultaneously designs the transmit beamformers of the ELAA and the reconfiguration matrix of the BDRIS. Simulation results show that the proposed system provides better performance with perfect and imperfect channel state information (CSI) than typical DRL algorithms and improves the min-rate performance by 3.86% and 13.6%, compared to the benchmark ELAA systems with the conventional reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) and without RIS, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".