MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414871600 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2025.3616518

Finite-Time Convergent Adaptive Sliding Mode Control for Integration of VSCs Into Modernized Microgrids With Parametric and Dynamic Uncertainties

2025· article· en· W4414871600 on OpenAlexaff
Rajdip Debnath, Gauri Shanker Gupta, Subrat Kumar Swain, Innocent Kamwa

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Robustness (evolution)MicrogridParametric statisticsConvertersLyapunov functionSliding mode controlNonlinear systemLyapunov stability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research article presents an innovative approach to enhance the performance and robustness of voltage source converters within microgrid systems. Existing controls suffer from slow convergence and unsatisfactory transient performance when dealing with disturbances, especially in the presence of control delay. To discourse these limitations, the proposed sliding mode controller is augmented with a nonlinear disturbance observer to enhance the disturbance elimination capability, attenuates the effect of parameter uncertainties, superior voltage reference tracking and suppressing chattering in the control response. The observer is introduced to estimate sensor values, potentially eliminating the need for dedicated sensors. The proposed control strategy employs a switching Lyapunov function-based mathematical model, addressing dynamic response limitations and switching action incorporating nonlinearities in the proposed model. By incorporating Lyapunov-based stability analysis, the article overcomes limitations and conservatisms associated with traditional linearized techniques, enabling more accurate stability assessments. Online adaptation norms are integrated to estimate and reject external disturbances, aligning closed-loop responses with reference models. Extensive numerical simulations and hardware-in-the-loop experiments validate the improved performance, highlighting the elimination of chattering and enhanced robustness against step and stochastic disturbances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207