MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414880155 · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1601796

The impact of behavioral and environmental factors on cancer mortality in G7 countries: a 20-year ecologic study

2025· article· en· W4414880155 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yezdan Caglar, Macide Artaç Özdal

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Care Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObesityPublic healthCancerMortality ratePopulationDistribution (mathematics)Cause of deathEcological studyDescriptive statistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The Cancer death rates prevails as a critical challenge on health systems globally. Whilst various factors such as economics and lifestyle factors are predicted to be influential, it is important to explain these relationship scientifically to develop targeted public health interventions. Objectives The investigation within this study concerns the interconnections between the rates of death arising from Cancer and pivotal lifestyle and economic factors of the populations within the economically advanced countries of the G7 (Germany, the United Kingdom (UK), The United States of America (USA), Canada, France, Italy, and Japan) over 20 years, from the year 2000 until 2020. Methods The data used in this study, including GDP (in United States Dollars USD - $) influence, obesity rate, pollution levels, population size, the prevalence of smoking, and the cancer death rates were collected from World Bank and Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Descriptive statistics, multiple linear regression, ANOVA, the case Processing Summary, and Principal Component Analysis were carried out to determine the distribution of data and interrelationships between independent and dependent variables. Results The findings of the study disclosed that the variables explained 58% of the variance in cancer mortality (R2 = 0.580). Definite connections between smoking prevalence, years of life lost, levels of obesity, the level of pollution, and the cancer death rate were established. Conclusion The study emphasizes the importance of targeting modifiable risk factors such as smoking, pollution, and obesity in cancer prevention and management. It highlights the importance of public health strategies focused on reducing these risk factors through targeted interventions. Additionally, equitable healthcare distribution must be considered in shaping effective policies to reduce cancer mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.485
Teacher spread0.409 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Public HealthSame topicGlobal Health Care IssuesFrench-language works237,207