Members of Lachnospiraceae produce valerate and caproate in response to short-chain fatty acids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The human gut microbiota ferments carbohydrates to produce metabolites that mediate beneficial community functions. While the production of the short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) acetate, propionate, and butyrate is well characterized, how valerate and caproate are produced has remained enigmatic. RESULTS: Here, we characterize the production of valerate and caproate by the gut microbiota. In a continuous culture model of a defined gut bacterial community, we observed that valerate took longer to reach physiological levels than acetate, propionate, or butyrate and correlated with Lachnospiraceae. This led us to test valerate and caproate production by members of Lachnospiraceae. While tested Lachnospiraceae isolates produced low levels of valerate and caproate at baseline, physiological concentrations of SCFAs activated valerate and caproate production in a species-specific manner. Furthermore, providing isotopically labelled SCFAs revealed that isolates of Anaerostipes hadrus and Coprococcus comes, which are members of Lachnospiraceae, directly incorporate exogenous acetate, propionate, and butyrate into valerate and caproate in a manner consistent with the reverse β-oxidation pathway. Therefore, we examined this pathway in Lachnospiraceae and found that Lachnospiraceae spp. encode different copy numbers and variants of the enzyme acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase (ThlA). ThlA performs the first step in reverse β-oxidation by condensing acyl-CoA molecules. We demonstrate that tested Lachnospiraceae ThlA protein variants consume propionyl-CoA and acetyl-CoA substrates consistent with valerate production. Coprococcus comes, the only tested species to produce caproate, encodes a second ThlA protein with increased activity on butyryl-CoA. In human fecal samples, multiple genera of Lachnospiraceae correlate with butyrate, while Coprococcus also correlates with caproate levels. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal a role of certain members of the Lachnospiraceae as prominent producers of valerate and caproate within human microbiomes through the reverse β-oxidation pathway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".