MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Patient-, care partner–, and clinician- proposed solutions to address the time toxicity of oncology care.

2025· article· en· W4414893630 on OpenAlexaff
Sai Sudha Valisekka, Whitney Victoria Johnson, Obafemi O. Ogunleye, Samuel Xavier Stevens, Manju George, Allison Breininger, Michael Anne Kyle, Christopher M. Booth, Timothy P. Hanna, Rachel I. Vogel, Helen M. Parsons, Anne Blaes, Arjun Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueJCO Oncology Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersPancreatic Cancer Action NetworkAmerican Cancer Society
KeywordsPsychological interventionAmbulatory careQualitative researchAmbulatoryHealth careWork (physics)Cluster (spacecraft)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

370 Background: As the concept of time toxicity has gained traction, work has largely focused on mapping and measuring time burdens. This qualitative study sought to elicit perspectives from people with lived or professional experience with cancer on strategies to decrease the time burden of oncology care. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 47 participants (16 patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer, 15 informal care partners, and 16 oncology clinicians with diverse roles) from one academic cancer center in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Interviews were conducted between 2/2023-10/2023 and transcribed and analyzed using a hybrid approach. Results: We identified 24 subthemes that we grouped into 5 themes (Table 1): (1) Personalized ambulatory care scheduling taking into account patient/ care partner needs and preferences; (2) Support for administrative and logistical tasks; (3) Home-based care when safe and feasible; (4) Clear and compassionate communication about time burdens; and (5) Innovations in care design and care delivery. Conclusions: Findings from this study will aid the oncology community in considering and designing interventions to decrease the time burdens of cancer care. Implementing individualized, person-centered solutions will require interventions at the patient, provider, health system, and policy levels. Themes, subthemes, and quotations. Theme Subthemes Illustrative quotes Personalized scheduling of ambulatory care Site of care close to home, personalized scheduling, cluster scheduling, cluster scheduling is not always preferred, designated schedulers, ensuring care is necessary "I was going over to [the university hospital] and then they got things set up at [community site] which is just five minutes from me, which made it much more convenient." (Patient) Support for administrative and logistical tasks Support with medical bills, insurance, and paperwork, adequate staffing for support "The bureaucracies of insurance and all of the time that it takes to get people what they need, is a huge stressor for not only patients and families, but also for the staff that have to do it." (Clinician) Home-based care Telemedicine, other home-based services, policy support “My goodness. Not having to come in [and be able to get the pump disconnected at home] was excellent.” (Care partner) Communication regarding time burdens Desire for information and guidance, setting honest expectations, using objective measures of time, using time burdens as a factor in decision-making “I really hate it when the doctor says "it’ll be quick" and then the receptionist books a 3-hour infusion, and then it takes 5 hours.” (Care Partner) Care innovation Shorter courses, oral, less frequent, and faster treatments, digital communication "I was scheduled to have chemo for six months and after this trial, they showed that you could have chemo for three months." (Patient)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJCO Oncology PracticeSame topicEconomic and Financial Impacts of CancerFrench-language works237,207