Peculiarities of Adaptive Reconstruction of Buildings and Their Potential for New Functions (Using Religious Buildings and Structures as a Case Study)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents an analysis of the adaptive restructuring of religious buildings and structures, taking into account their new functional capabilities, with examples drawn from international experience. The main objective and concept of the study are focused on analyzing completed projects of the adaptation of religious buildings carried out by contemporary architects and engineers. The works and approaches discussed in this article can be utilized by architects, engineers, restorers, and urban planners when planning projects for the restoration, reconstruction, and repurposing of religious buildings and structures. The study includes examples of the adaptation of Christian church buildings in countries such as the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, the Netherlands, and others. The research demonstrates how historic buildings can be successfully adapted to meet contemporary needs while preserving their historical and cultural heritage, which is crucial for the sustainable development of cities. The adaptation of church spaces for new functions (such as museums, exhibition halls, concert halls, libraries, etc.) provides opportunities for social interaction, cultural exchange, and economic development. The study deepens the understanding of the transformation of sacred spaces and their integration into everyday life, thus expanding the boundaries of architectural theory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".