MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414904272 · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ae1094

Inferring the neutron star equation of state with nuclear-physics informed semiparametric models

2025· article· en· W4414904272 on OpenAlexafffund
S. C. Cindy Ng, Isaac Legred, L. Suleiman, Philippe Landry, Lyla Traylor, J. Read

Bibliographic record

VenueClassical and Quantum Gravity · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
FundersInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsNeutron starEquation of stateGravitational waveNuclear matterBayesian inferenceMillisecond pulsarDissipative systemPolytropic processGaussian processBayesian probability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Over the past decade, an abundance of information from neutron-star observations, nuclear experiments and theory has transformed our efforts to elucidate the properties of dense matter. However, at high densities relevant to the cores of neutron stars (NSs), substantial uncertainty about the dense matter equation of state (EoS) remains. In this work, we present a semiparametric EoS framework aimed at better integrating knowledge across these domains in astrophysical inference. We use a meta-model and realistic crust at low densities, and Gaussian process (GP) extensions at high densities. Comparisons between our semiparametric framework to fully nonparametric EoS representations show that imposing nuclear theoretical and experimental constraints through the meta-model up to nuclear saturation density results in constraints on the pressure up to twice nuclear saturation density. We also show that our GP trained on EoS models with nucleonic, hyperonic, and quark compositions extends the range of EoS explored at high density compared to a piecewise polytropic extension schema, under the requirements of causality of matter and of supporting the existence of heavy pulsars (PSRs). We find that maximum Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff masses above <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>3.2</mml:mn> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0"/> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> can be supported by causal EoS compatible with nuclear constraints at low densities. We then combine information from existing observations of heavy PSR masses, gravitational waves emitted from binary NS mergers, and x-ray pulse profile modeling of millisecond PSRs within a Bayesian inference scheme using our semiparametric EoS prior. With information from all public NS Interior Composition ExploRer PSRs (including PSR J0030+0451, PSR J0740+6620, PSR J0437–4715, and PSR J0614–3329), we find an astrophysically favored pressure at two times nuclear saturation density of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>ρ</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>nuc</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mn>1.98</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1.08</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2.13</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>34</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> dyn cm −2 , a radius of a <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1.4</mml:mn> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0"/> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> NS value of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1.4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mn>11.4</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.60</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.98</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> km, and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>max</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mn>2.31</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.23</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.35</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0"/> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⊙</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> at the 90% credible level (C.L).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClassical and Quantum GravitySame topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207