MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414904529 · doi:10.1088/2752-5295/ae1051

Growth synchrony in white spruce across Canada and Alaska: climate or distance?

2025· article· en· W4414904529 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fang Wu, Junwen Jia, Cheng Li, Xuefeng Cui

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Research Climate · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTree-ring climate responses
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBorealTaigaSpatial ecologyPopulation growthClimate changePopulationWhite (mutation)Common spatial pattern

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Boreal forests, which serve as major terrestrial carbon sinks, are experiencing rapid warming across much of their range. Spatial synchrony in tree growth is crucial for the stability and persistence of these forests. Despite its importance, the geographic patterns and drivers of tree growth synchrony in boreal forests remain underexplored. This study aims to address these gaps by investigating growth synchrony of white spruce ( Picea glauca ), a widespread boreal species of significant ecological and economic value. Using tree-ring data from 187 sites, we quantified growth synchrony with the synchronous growth change coefficient, a non-parametric index capturing consistency in year-to-year variations. We then analyzed its spatial pattern and drivers using complex network analysis and multiple regression on distance matrices (MRM). We found that white spruce growth synchrony follows a clear biogeographical pattern, decreasing from northwest to southeast. The relationship between growth synchrony and geographic distance was non-linear, deviating from the typical distance-decay pattern described by Tobler’s First Law of Geography. Specifically, synchrony increased as geographic distance decreased at shorter distances, but reversed at longer distances, where more distant sites showed relatively stronger synchrony. MRM analysis showed that climate factors explained 55% of the variance in growth synchrony, with geographic proximity contributing minimally after accounting for climate (increasing to 56%). These results suggest that synchronization of climate, particularly temperature, was the primary driver of spatial synchrony in white spruce growth, while spatial proximity-related mechanisms played a limited role. Given that high synchrony can reduce population stability, we recommend prioritizing management efforts that promote asynchronous growth, especially in regions exhibiting strong synchrony (e.g. northern Northwest Territories and Yukon). These findings provide new insights into boreal forest dynamics and inform adaptive management and conservation strategies in the face of ongoing climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Research ClimateSame topicTree-ring climate responsesFrench-language works237,207