MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414920042 · doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102178

Spatiotemporal analysis of the FWI over Europe and North Africa: Historical trends and climate projections under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5

2025· article· en· W4414920042 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoscience Frontiers · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeClimate modelGlobal warmingPreparednessTrend analysisFire regimeClimate pattern

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• FWI trends analyzed over Europe & N. Africa from 1979 to 2098. • Extreme fire danger increases under both RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios. • Strong agreement (r > 0.8) between reanalysis and GCMs in fire-prone areas. • Southern regions show significant increasing trends in FWI. Wildfires represent an escalating environmental threat across Europe and North Africa, increasingly exacerbated by climate-driven shifts in temperature, precipitation, and drought patterns. However, there is still limited large-scale, methodologically consistent research that simultaneously assesses historical patterns and future projections of fire danger across these regions, particularly in terms of both frequency and duration of risk under different climate scenarios. This study addresses this gap by providing a high-resolution, spatiotemporal assessment of fire weather conditions, with the aim of offering critical insights to support climate-adaptive fire management strategies, extended preparedness frameworks, and the integration of future fire weather projections into land-use and risk governance policies. To achieve this, we investigate historical (1979–2021) and projected (2000–2098) trends in fire danger using the Canadian Fire Weather Index (FWI), based on ERA5 reanalysis data and outputs from five Global Climate Models (GCMs) under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios. Over 50,000 land grid cells were analyzed to assess the frequency and duration of six FWI danger classes. Different metrics were used to quantify the agreement between historical reanalysis data and GCM outputs, while the Seasonal Kendall (SK) test was applied to detect trends. Results reveal a substantial decline in the duration of the very low FWI class, from 36 to 23 months, and significant increases in both the duration and frequency of the extreme FWI class, reaching up to 6.38 months and 14.42 % under the RCP8.5 scenario. Correlation coefficients exceed 0.8 across much of Southern Europe and North Africa, indicating strong temporal agreement. Trend analyses reveal statistically significant increases in fire danger across southern latitudes, while Northern Europe shows mixed or decreasing trends. These findings project a dramatic intensification and expansion of fire-prone conditions, particularly under high-emission scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it