History and Narrative Semiology of Concept Albums : Examples from Québécois and French Corpora from 1968 to 1987
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette thèse examine des albums concepts français et québécois de 1967 à 1987. Elle aborde l’album concept à la fois comme une œuvre narrative plurimédiale, dont les composants sont organisés autour d’un fil conducteur sémantique, et comme une production phonographique sur le marché musical, évoluant parfois en franchise transmédiatique. L’étude se concentre sur deux processus clés, la mise en album et la mise en marché, en analysant leurs formes, leurs objectifs et leur déploiement dans la musique française et québécoise de la période étudiée. Avec une approche narratologique, ce travail vise à identifier comment la narrativité des albums se manifeste à tous les niveaux : paroles, musique, performance vocale, ingénierie du son, images et structure de la pochette, récit promotionnel, spectacles et adaptations transmédiales. Par ailleurs, une perspective cantologique est utilisée pour caractériser l’esthétique des albums concepts français et québécois au sein de la chanson francophone et de la musique populaire occidentale en général, notamment par rapport au corpus anglophone de la même période.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".