MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414924117 · doi:10.17352/2455-5487.000107

Efficacy of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) Technique in Patients with Cervical-Originated Arm Pain on Pain and Functional Disability: A Single-Arm Pilot Trial

2025· article· en· W4414924117 on OpenAlexaff
Shilpasree Saha

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Novel Physiotherapy and Physical Rehabilitation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsCanadian Physiotherapy Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacilitationMuscle weaknessProprioceptionDashWeaknessPilot trialElectromyography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cervical-originated arm pain (COAP) occurs when a cervical nerve root is affected, causing pain and muscle weakness that can lead to disability. The PNF technique concentrates on activating both the agonist and antagonist muscle groups to enhance neuromuscular control and improve functional movement patterns. The current study aimed to determine the effectiveness of PNF for cervical-originated arm pain. Method: 10 patients with COAP received treatment using PNF and conventional physiotherapy for 2 weeks (6 sessions per week). Pre- and post-test data were collected for arm pain using the NPRS 101, neck pain and disability using the NPAD, and upper extremity disability using the Quick DASH Questionnaire, and were analysed. Results: Results showed statistically significant improvement (p<0.05) in all outcomes. Conclusions: This study concluded that the use of PNF to treat COAP is effective in clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Novel Physiotherapy and Physical RehabilitationSame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207