Mucoadhesive micelles for ophthalmic drug delivery
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The most common formulation for treating ocular conditions is topical eyedrops, despite their well-documented inefficiency. In this study, mucoadhesive nano-micelles were developed to overcome the poor efficacy of topical eyedrops in the treatment of dry eye disease. The micelles contained a pre-activated thiomer capable of releasing mucolytic N-acetylcysteine upon covalent disulfide exchange with the natural mucus layer which covers the surface of the eye. The micelles, approximately 70 nm in diameter, were shown to be mucoadhesive through zeta potential analysis. The critical micelle concentration was determined to be 217 mg/L using the pyrene fluorescence method. The core of the micelles was loaded with cyclosporine A, displaying a greater than 90% entrapment efficiency, and yielding sustained release of approximately 57% over 10 days. The cellular response to the micelles was tested with human corneal epithelial cells by MTT assay and Live/Dead staining. It was found that lower concentrations of the amphiphilic polymer resulted in greater cellular viability and in all cases, viability increased from 24 to 48 h following treatment. Overall, these mucoadhesive systems have potential to provide more efficacious treatment of anterior segment ocular conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it