MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414934532 · doi:10.1186/s12982-025-00986-9

Rapid assessment of femalegenital schistosomiasis risk in three schistosomiasis endemic communities of Osun state, Nigeria

2025· article· en· W4414934532 on OpenAlexaff
Olabanji Surakat, Oluwadamilare Dauda, Fatimah Malcolm, Hammed Oladeji Mogaji, Martins Imhansoloeva, Ogechukwu B. Aribodor, Obidimma Ezezika, Monsuru Adeleke

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscover Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicParasites and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchistosomiasisSocioeconomic statusBathingPublic healthSex organRisk assessmentEpidemiologyHelminthiasis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Female Genital Schistosomiasis (FGS) has continued to garner attention of public health stakeholders in Nigeria, with interest to understand the burden and associated risk factors, especially in known schistosomiasis hotspots. This study therefore assessed likelihood rates of FGS, including associated awareness, symptoms and risk factors across communities that had reported high burden of urogenital schistosomiasis in Osun State. We conducted a cross-sectional study among 302 females aged 12years and above across 3 selected communities (Ore, Eko-Ende and Illie) that shares proximity with Erinle Dam in Osun State. FGS likelihood rates were assessed using already pretested simplified FGS checklists, and structured questionnaires were used to obtain demographic and socioeconomic factors. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, with significant levels established at p < 0.05. Of the 302 participants, only 5.6% were aware of schistosomiasis, and none knew FGS. Washing was the most predominant exposure activity to freshwater bodies ( n = 244, 81%, p = 0.99), followed by fetching ( n = 159, 53%, p = 0.004), and bathing activity ( n = 154, 51%, p = 0.15). Most of the participants experienced pelvic pain (27%), urinary symptoms (18%) and irregular menses (15%) than any other genital symptoms ( p < 0.05). Based on likelihood score of 7, about 98% of participants in Ore (FGS score; 17), 98% in Eko-Ende (FGS score: 18), and 92% in Illie (FGS score: 15) are likely to have FGS. Participants aged 12-25years had higher (47%, p < 0.05) likelihood compared to older age groups. Similarly, study participants who are traders have a 9% higher risk of FGS. The use of improved latrines was protective for FGS (16% reduced risk, p < 0.05). The study highlights the high risk of FGS among young females due to significant exposure to infested freshwater, pointing to gaps in current preventive measures. Concerted efforts are needed, prioritizing effective diagnostics, treatment, and behaviour change interventions to reduce FGS risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscover Public HealthSame topicParasites and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207