MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414934578 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-19141-0

Multi-modal deep-attention-BiLSTM based early detection of mental health issues using social media posts

2025· article· en· W4414934578 on OpenAlexaff
Qasim Bin Saeed, Young‐Jin Cha

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health via Writing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial mediaMental healthTimestampFeature (linguistics)Process (computing)Deep learningFocus (optics)Social network (sociolinguistics)Fuse (electrical)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rising prevalence of mental health disorders such as depression, anxiety, and bipolar disorder underscores the urgent need for effective tools to enable early detection and intervention. Social media platforms like Reddit offer a rich source of user-generated content that reflects emotional and behavioral patterns, making them valuable for mental health analysis. However, many existing social media-based approaches focus solely on textual or audiovisual features, often overlooking temporal posting behaviors that can provide crucial contextual cues. Addressing this gap, this study proposes a multi-modal deep learning framework that integrates both linguistic and temporal features from social media posts to detect early signs of mental health crises. The proposed architecture, named DABLNet, utilizes social media post text and timestamp information as input to model the sequential dependencies between user behavior and various mental health conditions. DABLNet consists of a Bi-directional LSTM (BiLSTM) to process textual content, an LSTM to process its temporal data, a cross-modal attention module to fuse outputs from both networks, and a dense layer for classification. This fusion enables context-aware prediction of mental health states. The model is trained and evaluated on a dataset of labeled Reddit posts, which were preprocessed through text cleaning, temporal feature scaling, and label encoding. Experimental results show that the proposed network outperforms traditional models, achieving a test accuracy of 75.96% and an F1-score of 73.76%. These findings highlight the benefits of combining temporal dynamics alongside textual information and provide a solid foundation for future improvements that use more sophisticated attention mechanisms or new data modalities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score0.773

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicMental Health via WritingFrench-language works237,207