MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414939112 · doi:10.5206/ijoh.2023.3.23152

Uniting Academic and Lived Expertise to Promote Housing and Health Equity

2025· article· en· W4414939112 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kara Young Ponder, DL Hancock, Tracy Nuzzo, Ingrid N. Berthomieux, Constance Newton-Woodson, Margot Kushel, Kelly M. Doran, Giselle Routhier

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal on Homelessness · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCenters for Disease Control and PreventionNational Institutes of HealthU.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
KeywordsHealth equityEquity (law)Value (mathematics)Lived experienceBest practicePublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Housing and health are uniquely intertwined. Both academic and lived expertise have much to contribute toward building a strong, well-grounded evidence base for advancing solutions to homelessness and promoting health equity. In this commentary, we present the two examples of partnerships between academic researchers and people with lived experience of homelessness in New York and California, highlighting the value and potential of this collaborative approach. We also reflect on best practices and lessons learned for replication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal on HomelessnessSame topicHealth disparities and outcomesFrench-language works237,207