MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414942088 · doi:10.2196/74902

A Vision-Language–Guided Multimodal Fusion Network for Glottic Carcinoma Early Diagnosis: Model Development and Validation Study

2025· article· en· W4414942088 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jin Zhao-hui, Yi Shuai, Yun Li, M. L. Chen, Yumeng Liu, Wenbin Lei, Xiaomao Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Medical Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlottisMedical imagingMultimodalityArtificial neural networkRadiomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Early diagnosis and intervention in glottic carcinoma (GC) can significantly improve long-term prognosis. However, the accurate diagnosis of early GC is challenging due to its morphological similarity to vocal cord dysplasia, with the difficulty further exacerbated in medically underserved areas. Objective: This study aims to address the limitations of existing technologies by designing a vision-language multimodal model, providing a more efficient and accurate early diagnostic method for GC. Methods: The data used in this study were sourced from the information system of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, comprising laryngoscopy reports and 5796 laryngoscopic images from 404 patients with glottic lesions. We propose a vision-language-guided multimodal fusion network (VLMF-Net) based on a large vision-language model for the early automated diagnosis of GC. The text processing module of this model uses the pretrained Large Language Model Meta AI (LLaMa) to generate text vector representations, while the image processing module uses a pretrained vision transformer to extract features from laryngoscopic images, achieving cross-modal alignment through the Q-Former module. By leveraging a feature fusion module, deep integration of text and image features is achieved, ultimately enabling classification diagnosis. To validate the model's performance, the study selected contrastive language-image pretraining (CLIP), bootstrapping language-image pretraining with frozen image encoders and large language models (BLIP-2), a large-scale image and noisy-text embedding (ALIGN), and vision-and-language transformer (VILT) as baseline methods for experimental evaluation on the same dataset, with comprehensive performance assessment conducted using accuracy, recall, precision, F1-score, and area under the curve. Results: We found that on the internal test set, the VLMF-Net model significantly outperformed existing methods with an accuracy of 77.6% (CLIP: 70.5%; BLIP-2: 71.5%; ALIGN: 67.3%; and VILT: 64.3%), achieving a 6.1-percentage point improvement over the best baseline model (BLIP-2). On the external test set, our method also demonstrated robust performance, achieving an accuracy of 73.9%, which is 4.6 percentage points higher than the second-best model (BLIP-2: 69.3%). This indicates that our model surpasses these methods in the early diagnosis of GC and exhibits strong generalization ability and robustness. Conclusions: The proposed VLMF-Net model can be effectively used for the early diagnosis of GC, helping to address the challenges in its early detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Medical InformaticsSame topicHead and Neck Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207