A Vision-Language–Guided Multimodal Fusion Network for Glottic Carcinoma Early Diagnosis: Model Development and Validation Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Early diagnosis and intervention in glottic carcinoma (GC) can significantly improve long-term prognosis. However, the accurate diagnosis of early GC is challenging due to its morphological similarity to vocal cord dysplasia, with the difficulty further exacerbated in medically underserved areas. Objective: This study aims to address the limitations of existing technologies by designing a vision-language multimodal model, providing a more efficient and accurate early diagnostic method for GC. Methods: The data used in this study were sourced from the information system of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, comprising laryngoscopy reports and 5796 laryngoscopic images from 404 patients with glottic lesions. We propose a vision-language-guided multimodal fusion network (VLMF-Net) based on a large vision-language model for the early automated diagnosis of GC. The text processing module of this model uses the pretrained Large Language Model Meta AI (LLaMa) to generate text vector representations, while the image processing module uses a pretrained vision transformer to extract features from laryngoscopic images, achieving cross-modal alignment through the Q-Former module. By leveraging a feature fusion module, deep integration of text and image features is achieved, ultimately enabling classification diagnosis. To validate the model's performance, the study selected contrastive language-image pretraining (CLIP), bootstrapping language-image pretraining with frozen image encoders and large language models (BLIP-2), a large-scale image and noisy-text embedding (ALIGN), and vision-and-language transformer (VILT) as baseline methods for experimental evaluation on the same dataset, with comprehensive performance assessment conducted using accuracy, recall, precision, F1-score, and area under the curve. Results: We found that on the internal test set, the VLMF-Net model significantly outperformed existing methods with an accuracy of 77.6% (CLIP: 70.5%; BLIP-2: 71.5%; ALIGN: 67.3%; and VILT: 64.3%), achieving a 6.1-percentage point improvement over the best baseline model (BLIP-2). On the external test set, our method also demonstrated robust performance, achieving an accuracy of 73.9%, which is 4.6 percentage points higher than the second-best model (BLIP-2: 69.3%). This indicates that our model surpasses these methods in the early diagnosis of GC and exhibits strong generalization ability and robustness. Conclusions: The proposed VLMF-Net model can be effectively used for the early diagnosis of GC, helping to address the challenges in its early detection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".