MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414944628 · doi:10.1139/cjfr-2025-0107

A multiscale representation learning algorithm for internal pest and disease damage imaging in trees

2025· article· en· W4414944628 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jing Qi, Hongju Zhou, Jiadong Zhang, Wen Zhan, Hongwei Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Structural health monitoringTree (set theory)Subspace topologySTRIPSInverse problemPattern recognition (psychology)Nondestructive testingRepresentation (politics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Forestry is a key pillar for the sustainable development of the economy and society, and assessing the health of trees is of significant importance for forestry protection. To address the challenges encountered in imaging tree internal pests and diseases, where the target size is small and its dielectric constant is similar to that of the surrounding medium—leading to blurred boundaries and potential target disappearance—this paper proposes the AtteNIS-subspace optimization method (SOM) imaging algorithm. The algorithm uses the output of the SOM algorithm as an estimate to establish a multiscale input–output learning framework. The frequency decoupling module, through an attention-based fusion strategy, combines with channel separation strips unit and frequency strips unit to achieve distributed outputs within the multiscale representation architecture, thereby enabling the inversion of the dielectric constant distribution in tree cross-sections. This study conducts comparative experiments with different percentages of moisture content, employing various quantities and sizes of tree cavities and insects based on models of cavities, insects, and hybrid models. Experimental results show that the proposed AtteNIS-SOM algorithm performs excellently across various models, demonstrating its robustness and adaptability. This provides new optimization insights for the application of electromagnetic wave-based nondestructive testing technologies in tree health monitoring and intelligent forestry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207