MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414946528 · doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2025.107859

Rapid skull decalcification for improved ultrasound transmission in brain imaging and histotripsy: A proof-of-concept study in rat

2025· article· en· W4414946528 on OpenAlex
Thomas Landry, Alyssa Forbes, Jeremy A. Brown

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasonics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Health AuthorityDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBone decalcificationUltrasoundSkullSonicationBrain tissueAttenuation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultrasound imaging and therapy of the brain is impeded by the reflection and attenuation characteristics of the skull, especially for high frequency imaging. In this study, the potential utility of surgically thinning and chemically decalcifying a region of skull bone was explored acutely in rats in vivo. It was found that thinning the skull to approximately 35 μm thickness and decalcifying with 20 % ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for at least 30 min effectively rendered the treated bone acoustically transparent for 5.4 MHz ultrasound therapy (histotripsy) signals and for 30 MHz ultrasound imaging signals. Simultaneous low intensity 1 MHz sonication of the site accelerated the process to achieve skull transparency levels at 15 min that were similar to 30 min without sonication. There was histological evidence of tissue damage caused by EDTA solution on the surface of the brain, depending on treatment duration. The long-term significance of this tissue effect and the longevity of the ultrasound transmission improvement are not yet clear.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score0.855

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it