MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414947602 · doi:10.3390/curroncol32100563

Health Effects of Ergonomics and Personal Protective Equipment on Chemotherapy Professionals

2025· review· en· W4414947602 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ana Reis, Vítor Silva, João Joaquim, Luís Valadares, Cristiano Matos, Carolina Valeiro, Ramona Mateos-Campos, Fernando Moreira

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Oncology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSafe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersonal protective equipmentHuman factors and ergonomicsOccupational safety and healthHealth professionalsHazardous wasteOccupational exposureHealth carePatient safety

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(1) Background: With the increasing incidence of cancer, the need for handling cytotoxic drugs has also grown. However, manipulating these drugs exposes healthcare professionals to significant risks, including occupational exposure to hazardous chemicals. Therefore, it is important to adopt protective measures, including personal protective equipment (PPE) and correct ergonomic practices, to ensure safe drug preparation and minimize health risks for the operators. However, while chemical exposure and PPE have been extensively addressed in the literature, the combined impact of ergonomic practices and protective measures remains insufficiently emphasized, representing a critical gap this review aims to address. Accordingly, the objective of this literature review was to analyze the ergonomic and individual protection practices during the handling of cytostatic drugs and all the implications that bad ergonomic practices and/or poor individual protection have on the operator’s health; (2) Methods: In order to perform this integrative review, a structured literature search was conducted using online databases (Web of Science®, Google Scholar®, and PubMed®) from January 2005 to June 2025. (3) Results: A total of 19 articles were analyzed, with 17 focusing on PPE and 17 on ergonomics. The findings emphasize that PPE, such as gloves, masks, gowns, sleeves and safety glasses, plays a critical role in the safe handling of cytotoxic drugs, particularly when combined with other safety measures. Additionally, maintaining correct ergonomic posture is important in preventing musculoskeletal disorders; (4) Conclusions: This review emphasizes the significance of integrating appropriate PPE use with sound ergonomic procedures. Although PPE is still the secondary line of defense against occupational exposure, ergonomic issues must also be addressed to avoid chronic musculoskeletal problems. Continuous training, rigorous attention to safety procedures, and ergonomic enhancements should be prioritized by healthcare facilities as a key element of occupational safety programs to reduce the short-term and long-term health hazards for personnel handling dangerous drugs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.549
Teacher spread0.399 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent OncologySame topicSafe Handling of Antineoplastic DrugsFrench-language works237,207