MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414950347 · doi:10.1101/2025.10.05.25337385

Admission photoplethysmography-based mortality prediction in hospitalized Ugandan children with suspected or confirmed infection: a feasibility study

2025· preprint· en· W4414950347 on OpenAlexaff
Mahan Rahimi, Matthew O. Wiens, Jerome Kabakyenga, Elias Kumbakumba, Nathan Kenya‐Mugisha, J. Mark Ansermino, Guy A. Dumont

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReceiver operating characteristicHospital admissionCohortRisk assessmentCohort studyClinical PracticePredictive modellingProspective cohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Sepsis remains a major cause of preventable pediatric hospital deaths in developing countries, with progress hindered by the lack of effective risk identification tools. Early detection of children at highest risk upon hospital admission is crucial for guiding clinical care and allocating resources, particularly in resource-limited settings. Photoplethysmography, which measures blood oxygen levels, also provides objective insight into cardiovascular alterations associated with sepsis. We conducted a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data from the Smart Discharges project, involving children under five years hospitalized with suspected or confirmed infection at six Ugandan hospitals, and developed models to predict all-cause in-hospital mortality across two age groups (0–6 and 6–60 months). Mortality was 7% in younger and 4.1% in older children. Machine learning models were trained on features extracted from one-minute photoplethysmograms collected at the time of admission. The best-performing model achieved mean values for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.62–0.76) in the younger cohort and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.56–0.73) in the older cohort, with corresponding values for the area under the precision–recall curve of 0.18 (95% CI: 0.12–0.27) and 0.14 (95% CI: 0.06–0.22), respectively. Calibration within risk strata was satisfactory (Brier scores 0.06 and 0.04), and decision curve analysis showed clinical utility. Notably, the models’ predictive capacity, although moderate, was achieved with a rapid and readily available objective measurement at admission, without the need for extended monitoring. While less accurate than most existing risk scores and not a substitute for clinical judgment, these simple admission-based models may help identify high-risk children and guide targeted interventions where sophisticated diagnostics are unavailable. External validation is needed before adoption. Author summary Sepsis poses a serious risk to children in hospitals with limited resources, and it can be difficult for healthcare workers to recognize which patients are in the most danger quickly. In our study, we investigated whether a simple fingertip sensor, commonly used in hospitals to measure oxygen levels, could help identify high-risk children upon arrival. We utilized data from Ugandan hospitals to develop computer-based tools that analyze signals from these sensors and support care decisions, eliminating the need for advanced equipment or laboratory tests. While our approach did not match the accuracy of the most advanced methods, it provided valuable information from a single, quick measurement at admission. These findings suggest that simple and accessible tools can still help staff make better decisions and prioritize children who require urgent care, even in settings with limited resources. We hope further work will refine these techniques and test their value in other hospitals and regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207