MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414953902 · doi:10.1115/pvp2025-154415

Elastic Interaction of Bolted Flange Joints During Untightening

2025· article· en· W4414953902 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Tofighi, Linbo Zhu, Abdel‐Hakim Bouzid

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Structural Analysis Methods
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlangeReliability (semiconductor)Bolted jointComponent (thermodynamics)Process (computing)Anchor bolt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The sequential removal or replacement of bolts of a bolted flange joints while being considered a simple operation that involves untightening of bolts can lead to failure of the remaining untighten bolts, damage the gasket, and harm other associated components. Additionally, challenges persist in ensuring system reliability and safety during hot bolting or single replacement of bolts. This paper aims to provide a deeper understanding of the elastic interactions within bolted flange joints during the unloading of bolts such that conducted during disassembly or hot bolting process. By analyzing the elastic interaction, common issues such as flange integrity loss and component damage can be effectively mitigated. Furthermore, the research seeks to enable more accurate predictions of flange behavior during untightening. This enhanced understanding could facilitate the development of more efficient tools or potentially enable the process to be performed safely without additional tools, provided safety factors are meticulously calculated. Ultimately, this study aims to improve the safety, efficiency, and reliability of systems that utilize hot bolting procedures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEngineering Structural Analysis MethodsFrench-language works237,207