MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414954508 · doi:10.1115/pvp2025-153867

Numerical Study of Self-Excited Oscillations and Aeroacoustic Sources of Jet Flows in High Temperature Gas Reactor Cores

2025· article· en· W4414954508 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammed Alziadeh, Salim El Bouzidi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nuclear Laboratories
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJet (fluid)CoolantVortexPlenum spaceCompressibilitySynthetic jetNozzleComputational fluid dynamicsStrouhal number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High-temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs) improve thermodynamic efficiency due to high operating temperatures and the use of chemically inert gas coolants promotes the longevity of the reactor components. However, the use of high speed gaseous coolants in such reactors can face flow- and acoustic-induced vibration issues. Previous operational experience in gas-cooled reactors have shown a history of these issues, ultimately resulting in economic losses due to project delays, unscheduled maintenance, and reactor shutdowns. Despite the advantages of HTGRs, limited data on the complex flow-sound-structure interactions in gas-cooled reactors complicate the design of future systems. Given the difficulties of creating comprehensive experimental test facilities, high-fidelity simulations have emerged as essential tools. In this study, the self-excited fluid-resonant conditions of a subsonic jet exiting the HTGR reactor core and impinging on the reactor plenum was numerically investigated. Focusing initially on a two-dimensional planar jet with impingement length-to-jet width ratios (L/H) of 7 and 10, a fully coupled, compressible CFD simulation was performed. The resulting flow field was post-processed to extract the acoustic field, and Howe’s integrand identified aeroacoustic energy exchange regions. It was found that the simulations captured the self-excited oscillations of an impinging planar jet at the different L/H. The Strouhal number based on the jet width (StH) closely matched the Rossiter model predictions and experimental data, while three anti-symmetric vortex cores in the vorticity field confirmed oscillations at the n = 3 jet-stage. Helmholtz decomposition revealed high acoustic particle velocities at the jet inlet and impingement region, indicating significant aeroacoustic energy exchange in these regions. The preliminary findings of this study demonstrate that CFD can be a valuable tool for investigating fluid-resonant conditions in HTGR systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCombustion and flame dynamicsFrench-language works237,207