MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414956242 · doi:10.1109/twc.2025.3615722

Efficient V2I Communication via IRS-Enhanced MIMO Backscatter With Non-Linear Detection

2025· article· en· W4414956242 on OpenAlexaff
Jinming Wang, Shuai Han, Sai Xu, Weixiao Meng, Cheng Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBackscatter (email)BeamformingCoordinate descentMIMOConvex optimizationTransmission (telecommunications)Interference (communication)Relaxation (psychology)Block (permutation group theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates an Intelligent Reflecting Surface (IRS)-enhanced vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) multiple input multiple output (MIMO) backscatter communication network. In this network, multiple IRSs send roadside information to a multi-antenna reader using the backscatter technique, while the inevitable self-interference at the reader is taken into account. To maximize the introduced system’s weighted sum rate, we propose an optimization scheme based on minimum mean square error with successive interference cancellation (MMSE-SIC). This scheme jointly optimizes the reader’s detection matrix, beamforming vector, and IRS reflection coefficients. The formulated non-convex problem is tackled using a block coordinate descent (BCD) algorithm combined with successive convex approximation (SCA) and semi-definite relaxation (SDR) methods. The proposed framework is compared with other schemes including the linear detection technique, highlighting the trade-off between performance and computational complexity. The study provides insights into the impact of key parameters, such as the reader’s transmit power and the number of IRS elements, on system performance. Furthermore, our findings lay the groundwork for future exploration of more effective transmission approaches in IRS-enhanced V2I backscatter communication networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207