MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414961399 · doi:10.64938/bijri.v9n4.25.jl044

Healing the Past: Generational Trauma and Identity in Turning Red

2025· article· en· W4414961399 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shivani Amoli

Bibliographic record

VenueBodhi International Journal of Research in Humanities Arts and Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMemory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepictionMetaphorIdentity (music)EntertainmentCurseAnimationContext (archaeology)Affect (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Animation is a powerful tool for engaging audiences in a fun and innovative way, especially in the context of animated children’s films. These films use vibrant visuals, imaginative storytelling, and relatable characters to connect with young viewers, making complex themes more accessible and engaging. This is particularly evident in Domee Shi’s Turning Red (2022), where animation is a medium for entertainment and a way to explore complex psychological and cultural themes. In the film, 13-year-old Meilin Lee, a Chinese-Canadian girl, transforms into a red panda whenever her emotions become overwhelming. The plot centers around an ancient curse passed down to Mei, causing her to change into a large, hairy, sweaty, and stinky red panda—utterly contrary to the traditional expectations of a 13-year-old girl. Using animation to explore these profoundly emotional themes, Turning Red presents a powerful metaphor for the psychological consequences of suppressing emotions, particularly anger, to conform to cultural and familial expectations. The film explores the impact of generational trauma on identity and emotional development, showing how these unresolved issues are passed down and affect one’s sense of self. Through its creative animation and vivid storytelling, Turning Red offers a meaningful exploration of self-acceptance and emotional expression. This paper will analyze the film’s depiction of generational trauma, examining how emotional suppression and the pressure to conform impact Mei’s identity and development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score0.494

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.188
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBodhi International Journal of Research in Humanities Arts and ScienceSame topicMemory, Trauma, and CommemorationFrench-language works237,207