MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

8287721 Extreme weather events caused by climate change: estimating the prevalence of at-risk workers

2025· article· en· W4414965358 on OpenAlexaffabout
Emily Heer, Jasmin Bhawra, Kristian Larsen, Nektaria Nicolakakis, Paul Villeneuve, Michelle Lu, Cheryl Peters

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtreme weatherExtreme heatClimate changeHazardPopulationRisk assessmentPopulation healthClimate risk

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale Climate change-related extreme weather events are projected to intensify yet there has been little research into the effects of these events on the health of workers. Through a literature review, we identified extreme heat, floods, droughts, and wildfires as priorities for study in Canada. We aim to assess the risk of mental and physical health effects from climate change-related extreme weather events on workers across Canada. Methods Employing CAREX Canada methods, we collected data on occupations and industries at risk of the extreme weather events indicated above. We used data from multiple sources to identify the population at risk: 2021 Canadian census, published literature, CAREX Canada estimates, and Canadian occupation databases. These were combined with health impacts and climate change predictions to create risk assessments for each occupation and industry. Results Estimates on workers at risk of heat stress as a result of occupational exposure to extreme heat will be presented. Occupations at risk include outdoor workers, as well as indoor workers in settings with inadequate ventilation. Workers who participate in high activity occupations, don protective equipment, and have less autonomy over workplace activities will have a higher hazard score among those exposed. Results will be presented by region in British Columbia, providing specific estimates for areas with greater exposure to extreme heat in the province, and nationwide by province. Conclusions The results from this study enhance our understanding of the health risks of climate change-related extreme weather events on workers. These results can provide crucial data that can lead to better protection of workers as climate change-related weather events become more common. CAREX Canada has a history of successful knowledge synthesis campaigns that will inform the dissemination of these data and will get the results to the audiences that will be most impactful.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate Change and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→