MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414977826 · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2025.112147

Field data on sea ice restoration by artificial flooding in subarctic Canada

2025· article· en· W4414977826 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cody C. Owen, Willem Schellingerhout, Tom Meijeraan, Fonger Ypma

Bibliographic record

VenueData in Brief · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceSlushSea ice thicknessArctic ice packSnowTransectSea ice concentrationAntarctic sea iceMelt pond

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A field campaign in the Milan Arm of Pistolet Bay in Newfoundland, Canada was conducted to gather data on sea ice restoration by artificial flooding between February and May of 2025. Sea ice thickening was initiated by pumping sea water from below the first-year sea ice onto the surface without significantly modifying the overall snow cover beforehand. Pumping consisted of 84 discrete events, for which GPS location, pumping start time and duration, and local snow and ice thicknesses were recorded. Remote data collection and monitoring were executed by three thermistor chains, three radiation sensors, and one anemometer. All remote measurement systems remained in the field until recovery of the floating systems following ice breakup in late spring. Additionally, coring systems were used to extract 10 ice cores for analysis of temperature and bulk salinity profiles through the ice depth to assess the effect of artificial flooding on sea ice formation and ablation. Two of the ice cores were used and three seawater samples were collected for analysis of the biological content of phytoplankton. Transects of surface composition across select flooded sites were assessed for the formation and solidification of ice and slush layers. Snow thickness and density data were sampled for a representative region of the entire site to assess spatial variability. All these data were complemented by timelapse camera imaging from each monitoring station and aerial drone imaging, including thermal imaging, of the entire region. The dataset can be used to investigate the physical processes involved in sea ice growth before, during, and after flooding. The dataset can be used, in a limited manner, to understand the formation, growth, and ablation of snow ice. The radiation data can be used to analyze the surface radiation fluxes of the parent, flooded, and melting ice. The data gathered during the melting season can be used to investigate the melting of thickened sea ice in comparison to that of natural sea ice. The data on bulk salinity can be used to investigate short-term brine migration. The data on phytoplankton content can be used to assess its change due to the impact of flooding. Combining the various data, thermodynamic ice growth and melt models of sea ice, including snow, slush, and snow ice, can be validated. The understanding of rain and meltwater drainage events could be improved and flow models for simulation of artificial flooding of snow-covered first-year sea ice could be further developed using the data. Aerial imagery obtained by drone provides insights into the flooding behavior of water over snow-covered ice, allowing for the detection and temporal tracking of both visibly impacted and visually concealed areas that may not be apparent to the naked eye.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData in BriefSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207