MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414981473 · doi:10.1016/j.xjse.2025.100081

Impact of supra-aortic vessel false lumen communications on aortic remodeling: Analysis from the PERSEVERE trial

2025· article· en· W4414981473 on OpenAlexaff
Kyle W. Eudailey, Sabin J. Bozso, Shinichi Fukuhara, Fernando Fleischman, Ibrahim Sultan, W. F. Brinkman, Hiroo Takayama, Arminder S. Jassar, George J. Arnaoutakis, Michael C. Moon, Wilson Y. Szeto

Bibliographic record

VenueJTCVS structural and endovascular. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAortic dissectionLumen (anatomy)Computed tomographyProsthesisDissection (medical)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective The PERSEVERE (ProspEctive, Single ARm, Multi-center Clinical InveStigation to EValuatE the Safety and Effectiveness of AMDS in the TREatment of Acute DeBakey Type I Dissection) Trial is a US investigational device exemption study designed to evaluate the Ascyrus Medical Dissection hybrid prosthesis in the open repair of patients with acute DeBakey type I dissection with preoperative malperfusion. We sought to determine the impact of false lumen (FL) communications within the supra-aortic vessels (SAV) on aortic remodeling by analyzing total aortic diameter (TAD), FL diameter, and true lumen (TL) diameter. Methods Ninety-three patients were enrolled from July 2022 to November 2023. Anatomic measurements were made by a core laboratory using computed tomography angiogram (CTA). For this study, analysis was limited to zones 2, 3, and 4. TAD was assessed on first postoperative CTA and at 1-year postoperatively, and growth was defined as >1.0 cm. In addition, the percent of patients with FL diameter larger than TL diameter were compared on the basis of the presence or absence of any FL communications in the SAV. Results Fifty-five patients had a preoperative, first postoperative CTA, and 1-year CTA scan and were included in the analysis. SAV FL communications were present on preoperative computed tomography scan in 35% (19/55) and absent in 65% (36/55). In those with SAV FL communications, TAD growth occurred in 0%, 5.3%, and 21.1% in zones 2, 3, and 4, respectively. In those without SAV FL communications, TAD growth occurred in 2.8%, 2.8%, and 8.3% in zones 2, 3 and 4, respectively; the difference did not reach statistical significance. The FL was larger than TL in significantly more patients in zones 3 and 4 in those with compared with those without SAV FL communications (zone 3, 53% vs 18%; zone 4, 58% vs 18%; P < .05). Conclusions The presence of preoperative SAV FL communications has a significant impact on aortic remodeling at 1-year postoperatively. The presence of these communications is associated with a trend toward negative remodeling in zones 2, 3, and 4, in addition to a significantly larger FL compared with TL diameter, likely representing ongoing FL pressurization. Techniques to better identify SAV FL communications preoperatively may lead to a more tailored approach to operative management and more targeted postoperative surveillance in these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJTCVS structural and endovascular.→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→