MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414982739 · doi:10.1002/cpt.70082

Application of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Inform Dose Selection of Mezigdomide in a Phase I Drug–Drug Interaction Study

2025· article· en· W4414982739 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFungal Plant Pathogen Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBristol-Myers Squibb Canada
KeywordsPhysiologically based pharmacokinetic modellingPharmacokineticsCYP3APharmacokinetic interactionDrug interactionDosingClinical pharmacologyP-glycoproteinClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mezigdomide (MEZI) is an oral, highly potent CELMoD™ agent with promising antitumor and immune-stimulatory activity, optimized for Aiolos and Ikaros degradation. Preclinical evidence suggests MEZI is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4/5 and has the potential to inhibit efflux transporters P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) in vitro. To predict the magnitude of enzyme- and transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDI) and inform clinical study design, a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed. A PBPK-informed Phase I clinical DDI study was conducted that evaluated MEZI as an object of CYP3A induction (rifampin) and inhibition (itraconazole) and as a precipitant of transporter-mediated interactions (digoxin and rosuvastatin). PBPK modeling predicted substantial interactions with strong and moderate CYP3A modulators, which informed a unique dose selection strategy, PK sampling time, and washout period. Clinical results confirmed reductions in MEZI exposure with rifampin (AUC reduced 93-95%) and increases with itraconazole (~14-fold for dose normalized AUC). MEZI was well-tolerated despite these changes in exposure. Additionally, coadministration of MEZI with P-gp and BCRP substrates, digoxin and rosuvastatin, showed no clinically meaningful changes in substrate plasma PK, indicating a low likelihood of significant transporter-mediated DDIs. The prospective PBPK model was refined with clinical data, improving predictions and supporting simulations for moderate/weak CYP3A modulators. This iterative "learn-confirm" approach underscores the utility of PBPK modeling in optimizing clinical trial design, ensuring participant safety, and anticipating DDI risks. The findings support MEZI's clinical development with informed dosing strategies, particularly for coadministration with CYP3A modulators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it