MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414992847 · doi:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf276.065

64defining cancer initiating cells and their vulnerabilities in renal cell carcinoma

2025· article· en· W4414992847 on OpenAlexaff
Zohreh Mehrjoo, Hellen Kuasne, Ariel Madrigal Aguirre, Ali Shahini, Matthew G. Annis, Anne-Marie Fortier, Tianyuan Lu, Larisa M. Soto, Hong Zhao, Dongmei Zuo, Virginie Pilon, Matthew Dankner, Tamiko Nishimura, Kevin Petrecca, Jonathan Spicer, Peter M. Siegel, Simon Tanguay, Hamed S. Najafabadi, Morag Park, Yasser Riazalhosseini

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Oncologist · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFerroptosis and cancer prognosis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalMcGill Genome Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscriptomeRenal cell carcinomaCancerSpheroidCellPopulationClear cell renal cell carcinomaIn vivoCell culture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common form of kidney cancer, leading to 179 000 cancer-related deaths annually. ccRCC initiating cells (CICs) are thought to drive tumor initiation, growth, therapy resistance, and metastasis, yet their molecular characteristics remain poorly defined. This study aims to identify putative CICs and their essential genes using a cell marker-agnostic strategy. Methods We performed a comprehensive analysis of ccRCC transcriptomes at single-cell resolution, developed patient-derived xenograft (PDX) and 3D patient-derived organoids (PDO) models of ccRCC, and conducted functional examinations in these models to investigate our findings. Results Computational modeling of tumor formation using single-cell RNA velocity analysis of five primary and metastatic ccRCC-PDXs revealed a minor cell population as the origin of other tumor cells, representing putative CICs. Pathway and network analyses suggested that a core network of proteins, conventionally known to regulate mitosis, are highly active in CICs and may be essential for their function. These proteins were expressed in PDOs and PDX-derived spheroids established following a CIC enrichment protocol. Spheroid cells exhibited higher tumorigenicity and colony formation ability than parental tumor cells, as confirmed by in-vivo injection in nude mice and in-vitro colony formation assays. Successive in vivo passaging confirmed the self-renewal capacity of spheroid-derived tumors. Pharmacological blockade of candidate proteins elicited dose-dependent inhibitory effect on spheroid and colony formation, with in-vivo validation showing that blocking these proteins significantly delayed tumor growth and more efficiently prevented tumor formation in mice. These results highlight the importance of these proteins in the cancer-initiating abilities of malignant cells. Interestingly, our results suggest that the identified target proteins may elicit their CIC-related function independently from their mitosis regulatory roles. Conclusions We identified and validated essential proteins in RCC-CICs, supported by single-cell transcriptome data and RCC spheroids and PDX models. Targeting the vulnerabilities of RCC-CICs, given their role in tumor initiation, progression, and therapy resistance, offers significant potential for developing new anti-cancer therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe OncologistSame topicFerroptosis and cancer prognosisFrench-language works237,207