MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414993075 · doi:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf276.038

37Integrative multi-omic characterization of the immune landscape in renal cell carcinoma

2025· article· en· W4414993075 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jennifer Pfeil, Shirley Hui, Daniel Stueckmann, Xiaoyu Zhang, Lisa Martin, Jennifer L. Gorman, Somi Afiuni, Jalna Meens, Maria Komisarenko, Stéphane Chevrier, Sujana Sivapatham, Julia Szusz, Zhihui Liu, Susan Prendiville, Laurie Ailles, Philip Jonsson, Fred P. Davis, Cristina Peñaranda, Ryan H. Newton, Nicolas Stransky, Piotr Bielecki, Gromek Smolen, Masoom A. Haider, Bernd Bodenmiller, Sarah Q. Crome, Gary D. Bader, Anthony Finelli, Hartland W. Jackson, Keith A. Lawson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Oncologist · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal cell carcinoma treatment
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMass cytometryImmune systemTumor microenvironmentTranscriptomeCellRenal cell carcinomaTumour heterogeneity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) has been characterized as being amongst the most immune infiltrated solid tumors with a highly heterogenous immune landscape. Within spatially organized cellular networks (CNs) of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), key immune cell-cell interactions (CCIs) impact immune cell function and organization ultimately impacting the patient’s overall response. Multiple studies have observed an association of tertiary lymphoid structures, a commonly observed spatial CN, with positive clinical outcomes in RCC, however additional CNs and the CCIs that control these networks need to be identified to better harness and potentially reprogram immune responses to improve patient outcomes. The recent explosion of interest in the heterogeneity of the immune landscape in RCC has led to numerous publications using the latest technologies in spatial transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics. However, many of these studies use this data in isolation and therefore, may be hindered by the technological biases inherent in each method. Here, we have developed a novel approach to integrate spatial and single cell multi-omic data harnessing the strengths of each technology to better interrogate CNs that exist in the RCC TIME. Methods Fresh surgical samples were procured at the University Health Network (Toronto, Canada) through the REnal cancer MicroEnvironment DiscoverY (REMEDY) study. Bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), single cell suspension mass cytometry (SMC), whole transcriptome digital spatial profiling (DSP), and imaging mass cytometry (IMC) was performed on spatially concordant tumor regions across 54 patients. scRNA-seq enabled the identification of immune, stromal, and malignant high-resolution cell states, which informed a tailored antibody panel design for SMC and IMC and served as a reference framework for harmonized cell-type annotation across modalities. This enabled the integration of our transcriptomic and proteomic data to delineate RCC-specific CNs enriched for defined CCIs across unique biological pathways. Results Using this integrative approach, we identified seven high-resolution patient immunophenotypes. To evaluate their prognostic and predictive relevance, we derived representative gene signatures using a linear mixed model (Flash-MM) to interrogate publicly available bulk RNA-seq datasets, including TCGA, JAVELIN, and IMmotion151. This analysis revealed immunophenotype-specific associations with survival following surgery or systemic therapy in univariate models. To explore potential biological mechanisms associated with these divergent clinical outcomes, we incorporated spatial information into traditional CCI analyses and performed pathway analyses to define functional relationships. This revealed that patient subtypes with high lymphoid infiltration exhibit greater spatial heterogeneity, potentially reflecting the coexistence of multiple activated immune pathways. In contrast, patient subtypes with low immune infiltration were enriched in more developmental signaling pathways. In addition to our biological observations, we were also able to assess the technological differences between patient matched samples and compare the ability of each technology to capture inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity. Conclusions Collectively, this work identifies clinically distinct subgroups defined by CNs and details the interpatient cellular heterogeneity that exists in RCC, providing the foundation for future personalized therapeutic interventions against this disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe OncologistSame topicRenal cell carcinoma treatmentFrench-language works237,207