“We Are About to Enter Satan’s Stronghold”: Chinese Opium Houses and Shared Multi-Ethnic Spaces in London’s Maritime District, <i>c.</i> 1860-1900
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines the myth of the Chinese opium den in mid-nineteenth-century London, focusing on how two opium houses in the maritime quarter became central to national fears about the Chinese community. Within the context of a growing hostility to Chinese labor in the shipping industry, popular literature and the press warned their readers of the malign influence of Chinese opium “dens.” The article challenges the stereotype of Chinese isolation, arguing that early Chinese communities were integrated into diverse working-class neighborhoods. It also highlights the role of English women, especially those working in opium and boarding houses, in fostering community cohesion and mediating local relations. By reinterpreting the district as a “contact zone”—a space of cultural exchange—the study shifts away from viewing it as an ethnically exclusive enclave. This perspective offers new insights into cultural appropriation, social class dynamics, and interracial community building in mid-to-late nineteenth-century London.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".