MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415000050 · doi:10.1142/s0116110525500313

Productivity Gains from Technology Imports and Spillovers in the Indian Manufacturing Sector

2025· article· en· W4415000050 on OpenAlexaff
Chandrima Sikdar, Kakali Mukhopadhyay

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Development Review · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProductivitySpillover effectForeign direct investmentManufacturingPanel dataManufacturing sectorInvestment (military)Technology gap

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

India is currently one of the fastest-growing emerging economies in the world, with a continued focus on maintaining its growth momentum and enhancing the productivity of its manufacturing sector. This paper aims to examine the impact of technology imports and spillovers on the productivity of the Indian manufacturing sector. Applying econometric analysis to a panel of 4,293 firms from various manufacturing subsectors for the period 2006–2019, the study assesses the productivity impact on technology-importing firms and the productivity spillover effect of imported technology on domestic firms. Results suggest that firms in India have not only benefited from imports and the usage of foreign technology, but they have also gained due to technology spillovers. Foreign direct investment has been the most important horizontal spillover channel. Large and technically efficient domestic firms have also derived productivity gains from the horizontal spillover channels of trade, technology purchases, and skill spillovers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Development ReviewSame topicGlobal trade and economicsFrench-language works237,207