MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415001675 · doi:10.14710/jpk.12.2.221-235

KONSEP PENGEMBANGAN AKTIVITAS PERDAGANGAN INFORMAL PADA KAWASAN ALUN-ALUN GRESIK

2024· article· id· W4415001675 on OpenAlexaff
Wanda Rifatul Afifah, Deni Agus Setyono, Eddi Basuki Kurniawan

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Pengembangan Kota · 2024
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHierarchy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pedagang Kaki Lima merupakan salah satu sektor informal perdagangan dan jasa yang tumbuh untuk memenuhi kebutuhan ekonomi. Masalah perkotaan akibat adanya PKL terjadi di Alun-Alun Gresik meliputi belum tersedianya peraturan daerah yang khusus dalam mengatur arahan lokasi PKL di Alun-Alun Gresik, kesemrawutan pola berjualan yang tersebar dan tidak teratur, kurang tersedianya infrastruktur penunjang bagi pengunjung, dan PKL yang tidak memiliki Surat Izin Menempati semakin bertambah. Tujuan Penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui karakteristik dan infrastruktur penunjang PKL serta merekomendasikan konsep pengembangan PKL di Alun-Alun Gresik. Metode analisis yang digunakan ialah Analisis Statistik Deskriptif, Importance Performance Analysis dan Analytical Hierarchy Process. Konsep pengembangan PKL di Alun-Alun Gresik didasarkan pada perhitungan analisis IPA dengan AHP, sehingga urutan variabel yang perlu dikembangkan ialah infrastruktur penunjang, kenyamanan, karakteristik PKL, dan kemudahan aksesibilitas. Prioritas pengembangan variable infrastruktur penunjang terdiri dari sub variabel ketersediaan air bersih (X2.2), tempat parkir (X2.5) dan drainase (X2.1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Pengembangan KotaSame topicEconomic Growth and Fiscal PoliciesFrench-language works237,207