Prospective Economic Evaluation Alongside the Telephone-Based Nurse-Delivered Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Postpartum Depression Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: , 2020). The economic implications of this therapy have not been explored. We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of telephone-based, nurse-delivered IPT compared with standard postpartum care, using resource utilization data collected alongside the clinical study. Study Design: We conducted a prospectively planned economic evaluation using patient-level data from the IPT trial, which enrolled 241 mothers with PPD. We considered costs from a societal perspective, measuring direct medical costs from study logs and secondary sources, as well as evaluating costs borne by the mother and family (including both medical and non-medical expenditures) and wage losses through questionnaires. We used a time horizon of 12 weeks post-randomization, corresponding to the endpoint of the clinical trial. Costs are reported in (2022) Canadian dollars. Results: = 0.234). When costs and effects were combined, the societal expenditure was $5,397 for each additional patient without PPD. Conclusion: Telephone-based, nurse-delivered IPT, as employed in this trial, showed no statistically significant differences in costs compared with standard care but resulted in improved clinical outcomes. Although associated with moderate uncertainty, the resulting incremental cost-effectiveness was well within the acceptable range for medical interventions in this population, and telephone-based, nurse-delivered IPT should be considered for patients with PPD. Key Points: · Telephone-based, nurse-delivered IPT is effective in treating PPD.. · We performed an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial of IPT, using patient-level data and considering costs from a societal perspective.. · Patients in the IPT group had more phone calls with public health nurses and fewer visits to psychiatrists, with overall similar costs between the two groups.. · The societal expenditure was $5,397 for each additional patient without PPD, which is well within the acceptable range for medical interventions in this population.. · Telephone-based, nurse-delivered IPT should be considered for cost-effective care of patients with PPD..
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".