MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415005383 · doi:10.3138/jcin-2025-0009

Non-immune hydrops fetalis associated with congenital bands and intestinal obstruction: A case report

2025· article· en· W4415005383 on OpenAlexaff
Emma Williams, Farid Aleali, Augusto Zani, Elke Zani‐Ruttenstock

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Insights in Neonatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParvovirus B19 Infection Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnasarcaHydrops fetalisPericardial effusionEdemaPeripheral edemaDifferential diagnosisEchogenicityExploratory laparotomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Non-immune hydrops fetalis can develop because of increased fluid in the interstitium and may be secondary to high plasma oncotic pressure caused by intestinal obstruction. Congenital bands are an uncommon cause of intestinal obstruction in the newborn. Neonatal intestinal obstruction should be considered as a rare underlying cause of non-immune hydrops when other, more common causes have been excluded. Case Presentation: A male infant was delivered at 29 weeks, 4 days of completed gestational age after an antenatal ultrasound demonstrated cardiomegaly, pericardial effusion, and multiple dilated echogenic fluid-filled bowel loops. Postnatal examination was remarkable for anasarca with peripheral edema and a distended abdomen. Trophic feeds were commenced on day 6 of life; however, rectal bleeding was seen soon after. Multiple imaging investigations were performed, with a contrast enema showing a discrepancy between the caliber of the large and small intestines. Exploratory laparotomy identified a thick congenital vascular adhesion band causing a partial obstruction. The infant had an uncomplicated post-operative course. Conclusion: Congenital vascular bands should remain as a differential diagnosis for cases in which radiological imaging has not identified characteristic findings of other causes of newborn intestinal obstruction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Insights in NeonatologySame topicParvovirus B19 Infection StudiesFrench-language works237,207