MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

WildFireSat:

2019· article· en· W4415005793 on OpenAlexaffabout
Joshua M. Johnston, Helena van Mierlo, Didier Davignon, Tom Schiks, Alan S. Cantin, Colin B. McFayden

Bibliographic record

VenueBiodiversidade Brasileira · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Natural Resources and ForestryUniversity of TorontoEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaCanadian Space AgencyCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScope (computer science)Government (linguistics)Presentation (obstetrics)Situation awarenessService (business)Satellite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early in 2019 the government of Canada provided pan-departmental support for the initiation of the WildFireSat satellite mission, to be launched in or around 2024. The Canadian Forest Service leads the initiative to adapt fire monitoring science to deliver the world's first truly operational dedicated wildfire monitoring satellite mission. WildFireSat is designed to address critical gaps in satellite fire monitoring for Canada's unique geography, and to primarily address the needs of wildfire management. This presentation provides a summary of the system design, alignment with existing systems, tier 1 and 2 data products, and the concept of operations (CONOPS) which will deliver comprehensive situational awareness to Canadian fire managers and decisions-makers in near-real-time, and support smoke forecast services. The intention of the presentation is to initiate discussions with respect to broadening the mission scope to include the international community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.118

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiodiversidade BrasileiraSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207