MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415007122 · doi:10.1139/cjb-2025-0003

New and interesting seaweed records from the Hakai area of the central coast of British Columbia: Phaeophyceae

2025· article· en· W4415007122 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Sandra C. Lindstrom, Matthew A. Lemay, Carly Janusson, Samuel Starko, Katharine R. Hind, Patrick T. Martone

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTula Foundation
KeywordsSporophyteIntertidal zoneAlgaeBrown algaeMainlandPhylogenetic treeLaminariaLaminaria digitataGenus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After 13 years of intensive sampling of seaweeds in the Hakai area of the central coast of British Columbia, we report on our collection of 67 of the approximately 100 brown algal species expected in the area based on known distributions. Most of these 67 species are distributed broadly in the northeast Pacific region. They were identified morphologically using primary and secondary literature and by sequencing the COI (cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1) gene in most instances. Laminaria yezoensis is recorded near its southern distribution limit, and Dictyoneurum reticulatum is recorded at its northern distribution limit. Although drift specimens of Postelsia palmaeformis have washed ashore, the species has not been found growing on Calvert Island but rather on the mainland just to the southeast. A number of species are reported for the first time in the northeast Pacific: we identified Hecatonema terminale, based on efforts to sequence several host species of red algae, an undescribed species of Acinetosporaceae previously identified erroneously as Hincksia granulosa that still requires a name, and undescribed species of Pylaiella and Ectocarpus. We describe as new to science Protohalopteris petersonii and Petrospongium munckiae and note a number of other species that require work before they can be identified to species, including a Ralfsia-like crust in the Chordariaceae. Distinctive haplotypes were found in at least four species, contributing to the uniqueness of this area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicMarine and coastal plant biologyFrench-language works237,207