MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sources of helium and associated heat in hydrothermal fluids from the central western branch of the East African Rift System (Democratic Republic of Congo and Burundi)

2025· article· en· W4415009965 on OpenAlexafffund
Wisdom K. Kavyavu, Daniele L. Pinti, Bienfait K. Simisi, Dario Tedesco

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHydrothermal circulationEast African RiftRiftMeteoric waterMantle (geology)Rift valleyVolcanoIsotopic signatureHelium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The area around Lake Kivu, situated in the western branch of the East African Rift System (WBEARS), which spans the Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda, and Burundi, is characterized in its southern part by numerous hot springs. Chemistry and isotopic signatures of hydrothermal fluids have been studied in the northern part of Lake Kivu due to the presence of one of the world's active volcanoes, Nyiragongo. However, the areas along the coast of Lake Kivu, extending south to the shores of Lake Tanganyika, where active volcanism is currently absent, have been largely overlooked, despite the presence of several tens of hydrothermal manifestations with temperatures ranging from 25 to 86 °C, located in a highly faulted region characterized by low to moderate seismicity. This study aimed to fill the gap by collecting samples from 15 hot springs, four lake waters, and one cold spring, located in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Burundi. Stable isotopes of water (δ 2 H and δ 18 O), noble gas isotopes of He, Ne, and Ar, Sr isotopic ratio ( 87 Sr/ 86 Sr), and major ions and trace elements were measured. Most water samples are classified as Na-K-HCO 3 or Ca-Mg-HCO 3 types. Stable isotopes indicate that the waters are of meteoric origin. The helium isotopic ratios ( 3 He/ 4 He or R), normalized to the atmospheric ratio (Ra = 1.384 × 10 −6 ), range from 0.058 to 1.304, indicating a dominant crustal helium source and a maximum of 13 % of mantle helium. The 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratios range from 0.70362 in the Lac Vert sample, typical of mafic volcanic products, to 0.77520 in hot springs of the Ruzizi basin, a very radiogenic value possibly indicating water-rock interaction with the Proterozoic silicate basement of Central Africa. The 87 Sr/ 86 Sr shows a rough trend with the 40 Ar/ 36 Ar ratios, indicating a slightly detectable terrigenic 40 Ar* excess in hot spring water. These results contrast with those on the northern shore of Lake Kivu, which are characterized by magmatic helium, suggesting that moving further south, the heat is controlled by the local geothermal gradient, with fluids likely circulating deeper into the crust and warming up. This circulation is facilitated by the extensional faults of the African rift, where most of the hot springs are located. Calculated low crustal fluxes of helium in the Lake Kivu region are insufficient to create economically valuable helium reserves, as found in the southern termination of the WBEARS, in the Rukwa Rift Basin. • Thermal springs and crater lake water south of Lake Kivu were sampled for chemistry and isotopes. • Stable isotopes indicate a meteoric origin, and chemistry suggests immature waters. • The presence of little radiogenic 40 Ar* and radiogenic 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratios suggests that fluids may circulate deep in basement rocks, heated by the local geothermal gradient. • Geothermal potential is likely restricted to low- to medium-enthalpy hydrothermal systems. • Low crustal helium fluxes in the region cannot create economically exploitable helium reserves, such as those found in the Tanzanian termination of the African Rift.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Volcanology and Geothermal ResearchSame topicGeothermal Energy Systems and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207